Labour's new industrial policy

White heat redux

The new strategy makes more sense but is the wrong priority

See article

Readers' comments

Reader comments on this article are listed below. The 15-day commenting period for this article has expired and comments are no longer being accepted. Review our comments policy.
1-2 of 2
willstewart wrote:
Jan 15th 2010 11:29 GMT

This is more complex than you give it credit for; why does government build infrastructure like roads and railways but prevaricate and claim state aid problems with infrastructure like universal fibre broadband, almost certainly a much better bet?

And government has a necessary role in regulation that no-one else can do.

Leviathan wrote:
Jan 17th 2010 8:26 GMT

Sadly, this Administration genuinely believe that the levers of power are connected to something on the front line, wherever it may be (e.g. business, health, education etc.).

Chief sufferer of this delusion in GB himself, who seems to believe that spending money will itself bring out change on the ground.

The desire to be seen to be 'doing something' has repeatedly taken priority over doing the right thing, even if that means doing nothing at all.

Will the Electorate see through this, or will they continue to delude themselves and / or blame the usual bogeyman? *sigh*

Back to top ^^
1-2 of 2
Beta v1.3

Advertisement

Advertisement

Latest blog posts - All times are GMT

Link exchange
From Free exchange - 2 hrs 2 mins ago
Daley news
From Democracy in America - September 7th, 19:38
Public enemy number-one
From Prospero - September 7th, 18:00
Pay more to sit up front
From Gulliver - September 7th, 17:08
More from our blogs »

Products & events

Stay informed today and every day

Subscribe to The Economist's free e-mail newsletters and alerts.


Subscribe to The Economist's latest article postings on Twitter


See a selection of The Economist's articles, events, topical videos and debates on Facebook.

Advertisement